Gasoline prices have fallen. Hence, automakers have to entertain alternative fuel vehicles to provide more options to consumers. This is especially true to automakers that are relying greatly on non-gasoline vehicles.
General Motors Corp. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner said, “With the price of oil at its lowest level in 19 months, we run the risk of reverting back to our traditional energy policy. That is, relying heavily on the lowest-cost energy available on world markets, including imported oil, without providing adequate support for developing alternative sources.â He also added, âI hope oil prices stay low, but I also hope that our nation stays committed to energy security through energy diversity.” The statement of Wagoner came after the revelation of the University of Michigan study that focused on auto executivesâ and other expertsâ comments on gasoline prices and government fuel economy standards.
At the annual automotive event, an auto supplier executive called for imposing a steep tax on gasoline to help fund the transition to alternative energy sources, especially hydrogen. Alternative fuel, also called alternate fuel, is any substance or material that can be used as fuel other than fossil fuels and other conventional fuels. It also pertains to renewable source of energy.
The essence of alternative fuel is to store energy in a stable form that can be easily transported from the place of production to the end user. The latter is then able to consume the fuel at will. The demand for alternative fuels is triggered by ecological concerns. In 2000, about 8 million vehicles ran on this type of fuel.
Alternative fuels include biodiesel, ethanol, butanol, chemically stored electricity like batteries and fuel cells, hydrogen, methane, vegetable oil, biomass, natural gas, wood and peanut oil. Types of alternative fuels include gasoline type biofuels like butanol, E85 with 85 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent gasoline blend, P-series fuels and hydrogen internal combustion. To boost the performance of the engine, car systems are modified. Toyota parts and accessories are modified to complement the fuel used by the vehicles. Volvo tie rods and other car parts are also engineered to specifically entertain the new technology.
At the North American International Auto Show, GM is showing off a concept plug-in hybrid named the Volt. It can travel 40 miles on battery power alone. In its totality, Volt offers a bold and quality statement. Chevrolet wants to prove that beauty and efficiency combined in one car.
Detroitâs Big 3 have been urging the Bush administration to help their efforts in developing alternative fuels like biodiesel and E85, an ethanol-based fuel. The Big 3 also seek aid in the production of batteries to power vehicles. It can be recalled that the top executives of the Big 3 met with Bush in November last year to discuss alternative energy plans however; they got no promises from the president.
Meanwhile, the Bush administration sought authority to raise fuel economy requirements for passenger cars. This was opposed by the Big 3. “One of the things that government has to do to really promote energy diversity is proactively support the development of alternative fuel technology,” Wagoner said. “And incentivize consumers through tax credits, fuel subsidies and so on to adopt these exciting new technologies.”
According to a recent survey conducted by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, respondents predicted that fuel prices and fuel economy standards will rise substantially in coming years. It was also anticipated that gas prices will average slightly more than $4 a gallon by 2015 and just over $5 a gallon by 2020. Respondents are composed of automakers, suppliers and other experts.
The study also found that Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for cars are expected to amplify to 33 mpg in 2015 and 38 mpg in 2020 which is a 38 per cent jump from today’s 27.5 mpg standard. For trucks, CAFE standards are predicted to rise to 27 mpg in 2015 and 31 mpg in 2020, a 44 per cent increase from 21.6 mpg today. “Our research reveals surprising agreement among all stakeholders in the automobile industry that fuel prices are on a steep upward trajectory,” said U-M researcher Bruce Belzowski.
“If we’re ever going to get there, we better start. That much I agree with,” said Don Altermatt, senior manager of diesel engineering for DaimlerChrysler AG regarding the proposal to boost alternative fuel sources. “Is there a need for a national energy policy? Absolutely,” added Nancy Gioia, director of sustainable mobility technologies and hybrid vehicle programs at Ford. “We have not got the kind of collaboration yet that we need.”
Glady Reign
http://www.articlesbase.com/automotive-articles/a-call-for-more-alternative-fuel-vehicles-in-the-us-98980.html
5 Responses
Redstate
2009 Oct 28 1Why are Liberals opposed to the development of the lectica, and alternative fuel vehicle???
I recently encountered a gaggle of Liberals who were discussing their desire to cripple the US auto-industry and economy by demanding that all vehicles be powered by “alternative fuels”, something that would cause the price of vehicles to skyrocket, ensure that only the rich could afford vehicles, cause a huge drop in the number of people purchasing automobiles, and put thousands of blue-collar auto-workers out of work.
In an attempt to “contribute”, I suggested that we reintroduce and further develop a vehicle called the lectica which is powered by table scraps, an alternative fuel, and releases no exhaust other then biodegradable waste.
http://www.vroma.org/~araia/litter.html
This vehicle is basically a covered padded bench or bed that is carried by slaves known as lecticarii. Since slaves can be fed table scraps and only excrete bio-waste as emissions (and the slaves could even be ordered to pick up their emissions), this vehicle would appear to be the perfect eco-friendly vehicle.
Furthermore, with the hegemonious strength of US military and the high reproductive rates in the world’s weaker nations, we would have an almost unlimited, and cheap, supply of lecticarii to power our lectica.
Yet, for some reason, these Liberals opposed the idea of developing this eco-friendly vehicle.
Why would Liberals oppose the development of such an eco-friendly vehicle???
Personally, I just think that the ’69 Charger, the Willy’s Coup, and other gasoline powered vehicles are much more efficient, much “cooler”, and much more desirable then the lectica, but, so long as Liberals continue to demand that America abandon such great technological accomplishments as the internal combustion engine, why don’t they return to proven environmentally friendly vehicles such as the lectica???
yeah_but_we_all_are
2009 Oct 28 2Maybe they were really just opposed to your silliness and you not taking the matter serious.
References :
nigelshiftright
2009 Oct 28 3Fine, then choke to death on your own poisons. you can live in Car Land and we’ll live in Oxygen Land.
References :
Hubert D
2009 Oct 28 4From the illustrations in your citing I would welcome the vehicle if those who propel it are neocons or far right radicals.
References :
Darth Vader
2009 Oct 28 5I see you have finally embraced the dark side.
References :
Leave a reply
Categories
Tags
alternative bill build cell cells cheap conservation costs diy efficiency efficient electric electricity eliminate energy environment free fuel generator global green grid heat home homemade house how kits make natural panel panels PHOTOVOLTAIC plant power renewable residential resources save solar sun system technology turbine windArchives
radio control boat
rc helicopters
rc cars
Recent Posts
Links
Meta